The key issue when proving a claim is that the professional must first owe a duty to take care in their relationship with the claimant. Often such duties are defined by the extent of their contract with the claimant but there are relationships, such as solicitor and client, financial adviser and client etc in which a duty of care has already been identified in law.
There are also other ways in which a professional can be held to be liable. These may be complex but in investigating a claim we would advise of any additional rights of action should they become relevant.
Once the duty of care has been established the next step is to prove that 'on the balance of probabilities' the professional involved has breached that duty. In other words, has the professional failed to meet the standard of care that other professionals would have exercised in similar circumstances? The test 'on the balance of probabilities' is the usual standard of proof that a claimant needs to establish to succeed in a civil action. The standard of proof in a civil case is far below the standard of proof in a criminal case which is defined as 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
Having proved that the duty of care has not been met, the claimant must then go on to prove that the breach of duties has caused some loss. If another factor has caused the claimant loss, which was not directly caused by the negligence of the professional, then the claim will fail. Some important points to think about when considering a legal claim:
For more information on professional negligence please contact Karim Mohamed.